| |
DOG Congress Home
Invitation
Organization, Deadlines
Overview of the Congress
Scientific Programme
Opening Ceremony
Ceremony 150 Years of DOG
Thursday, 20.September
Friday, 21.September
Saturday, 22.September
Sunday, 23.September
Poster Sessions
Symposia
Courses
Satellite Programme
Information
Social Programme
Sponsors, Exhibitors
DOG Homepage
|
|
AbstractP 157 Increased optic disc area as a possible source of selection bias leading to assessment by Heidelberg-Retina-Tomography (HRT) in young patients Schafia A., Jonescu-Cuypers C., Löw U., Seitz B. Department of Ophthalmology, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar Objective: In this cross-sectional study of HRT measurements we examined if the mean optic disc area (ODA) differed in a group of young versus old patients taken from a cohort of glaucoma clinic outpatients and if an increased ODA would possibly make further HRT assessment more likely. Methods: HRT measurements of ODA and Cup-Disc-Ratio (CDR) from two groups taken from a cohort of patients with glaucoma or suspected glaucoma were examined. Assessment of the Optic Disc by HRT occurred once in each patient (cross-sectional study). Group A: N=100 patients aged 26 years or below. Group B: N=887 patients aged 27 years or above. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 11.0. Results: Group A: mean age 17.1(±5.56) years, mean measured ODA 2.28(±0.34) mm2 and mean CDR 0.34(±0.18). In this group a correlation was neither found between age and ODA(R=0.01) nor between age and CDR(R=0.039). Group B: mean age 54.9(±14.10) years, mean measured ODA 2.19(±0.66) mm2 and mean CDR 0.37(±0.23). In this group a correlation was neither found between age and ODA(R=0.01) nor between age and CDR(R=0.036). Mean ODA in group A was found to be significantly larger than mean ODA in group B (p<0.04). Conclusions: Mean optic disc area was found to be significantly larger in younger patients than in older patients. This could indicate a possible selection bias in younger patients with larger optic discs towards more frequently considering the necessity of further HRT assessment. Another finding indicating the larger ODA as a source of possible bias is that the mean CDR found in the younger patients tended to be smaller than the mean ODA of the older patients.
|
|