DOG Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft 105. DOG-Kongress
  English Site  
  DOG Congress Home

Invitation
Organization, Deadlines
Overview of the Congress

Scientific Programme
Opening Ceremony
Ceremony 150 Years of DOG
Thursday, 20.September
Friday, 21.September
Saturday, 22.September
Sunday, 23.September
Poster Sessions
Symposia
Courses
Satellite Programme

Information
Social Programme
Sponsors, Exhibitors

DOG Homepage
 

Abstract

P 196

Functional deficiencies in diabetic patients with frequency doubling technique (FDT) and microperimetry (MP)

Shenoy R.1, Bialasiewicz A. A.1, McIlvenny S.2, Ganguly S.3 
1Department of Ophthalmology and School of Ophthalmic Technicians, 2Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, 3Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman

Objective: To compare the results of retinal function evaluation in patients with diabetes mellitus type II with varying retinopathy using FDT (Matrix®, Zeiss-Humphrey) and MP (NIDEK®- MP-1).
Methods: One eye each of 110 patients (110 eyes) with proven diabetes mellitus type II underwent fluorescein angiography, FDT (5° square pattern grating test object, spatial frequency of 0.5 cycles/degree over 16 points) and MP (10 dB threshold white Goldmann stimulus type II object over 46 points, fixation on a 2º single cross pattern). Test duration and retinal sensitivity of patients was compared to age-matched nondiabetic controls and correlated with the severity of diabetic retinopathy.
Results: Absent retinopathy: 59 eyes (54%), retinopathy: 51 eyes (46%). Of the latter, nonproliferative retinopathy 15 (30%) proliferative vitreoretinopathy 8 (14%), diabetic maculopathy 28 (56%). Defective visual field (FDT), unstable fixation (FDT), and subnormal retinal sensitivity (microperimetry) was significant (p<0.01) in 66 (60%) of the study group (absent retinopathy: 20 (30%), NPDR 13 (20%), diabetic maculopathy 33 (50%)), versus 17 (15%) controls. Prolonged test response of >2 min FDT, and 5 min MP was significant (p<0.01) in 61 (55%) of the study group (absent retinopathy: 21 (34%), NPDR: 16 (26%), diabetic maculopathy: 24 (40%)), versus 11 (10%) controls.
Conclusions: Psychophysical changes correlate with the severity of retinopathy in all patients with diabetes mellitus type II.

 
Previous page    
Top of page