| |
DOG Congress Home
Invitation
Organization, Deadlines
Overview of the Congress
Scientific Programme
Opening Ceremony
Ceremony 150 Years of DOG
Thursday, 20.September
Friday, 21.September
Saturday, 22.September
Sunday, 23.September
Poster Sessions
Symposia
Courses
Satellite Programme
Information
Social Programme
Sponsors, Exhibitors
DOG Homepage
|
|
AbstractDO.03.06 Secondary lens implantation of retropupillary iris-claw-lenses and sclera fixated posterior chamber lenses clinical comparison of complications Rüfer F., Saeger M., Nölle B., Roider J. Augenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel Objective: Aphakic patients with loss of capsular support undergo secondary implantation of sclera fixated posterior chamber lenses in many cases. How far implantation of retropupillary iris-claw-lenses is a safe alternative to sclera fixation has not been compared thoroughly enough by now. Methods: The data of 77 patients who underwent secondary lens implantation were compared retrospectively. In 26 cases retropupillary iris-claw-lenses were implanted (group 1), in 51 cases sclera fixated posterior chamber lenses were implanted (group 2). The postoperative complications were analysed. The reasons which lead to aphakia in group 1/ group 2 were: Complications following cataract surgery (54%/53%), primary ocular trauma (30%/29%), Marfans disease with lens luxation (8%/6%) and loss of the intraocular lens following vitreous surgery (8%/12%). In group 1 the operation was combined with penetrating keratoplasty in 12 cases. In group 2 vitrectomy was performed in all patients who had none in their history. Results: In group 1 perioperatively occurred the following complications within one week: Ocular hypotony 8%, choroidal detachment 4%, vitreous hemorrhage 4%, decentration of IOL 4%, transitory IOP elevation 4%; in group 2: Transitory IOP elevation 27%, ocular hypotony 12%, transitory intraocular inflammation 6%, choroidal detachment 4%, vitreous hemorrhage 4%, iris capture 4%, IOL dislocation 4% and retinal detachment 2%. Complications occurring later than one week postoperatively in group 1 were: Secondary glaucoma 27%, IOL luxation 8%, iris lesion 8%, pupillary deformation 4%, corneal ulcer 4%, epiretinal gliosis 4%; in group 2: Secondary glaucoma 6%, retinal detachment 4%, corneal decompensation 4%, pupillary deformation 4%, bacterial keratitis 2%, epiretinal gliosis 2% and lens tilt 2%. Conclusions: The most common complication following retropupillary implantation of iris-claw-lenses was secondary glaucoma. Secondary implantation of retropupillary iris-claw-lenses seems to be associated with a low complication rate, it is an alternative to sclera sutured secondary lenses in patients with absence of capsular support.
|
|