DOG Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft 105. DOG-Kongress
  English Site  
  DOG Congress Home

Invitation
Organization, Deadlines
Overview of the Congress

Scientific Programme
Opening Ceremony
Ceremony 150 Years of DOG
Thursday, 20.September
Friday, 21.September
Saturday, 22.September
Sunday, 23.September
Poster Sessions
Symposia
Courses
Satellite Programme

Information
Social Programme
Sponsors, Exhibitors

DOG Homepage
 

Abstract

SO.05.03

How important are visual field defects when crossing a road junction? Examination of normal-sighted subjects and patients with homonymous visual field defects under virtual reality conditions

Schiefer U.1, Papageorgiou E.1,2, Schoenfisch B.3, Hardiess G.4, Mallot H. A.4
1Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Germany; 2EU-PERACT MEST-CT-2004-504321; 3Department of Medical Biometry, University of Tuebingen, Germany; 4Dept. of Zoology, Lab of Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Tuebingen, Germany

Objective: The visual field plays an important role when evaluating driving fitness. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of homonymous visual field defects (HVFDs) when navigating over a road junction if one also takes into account visual exploration using eye and head movements.
Methods: HVFDs (assessed by binocular semi-automated kinetic perimetry within the 90° visual field, stimulus III4e, 3°/s, with correction for individual reaction times) as well as visual exploratory movements (assessed with eye and head tracking) were superimposed on the trajectories of virtual vehicles on a temporal or spatial scale. The following parameters were visualized and analyzed: (i) Presence versus absence of exploratory movements and – in case of verifiable exploration – (ii) Point in time / distance from the intersection, at which exploration was initiated, (iii) Time span / distance of exploration of a potentially collision-relevant vehicle, and (iv) Resulting modification of driving behavior (in terms of speed change) after / due to exploration of collision-relevant vehicles.
Results: Twenty-seven patients (10 female, 17 male, age range 19-71 years) with HVFDs due to vascular brain lesions (time after lesion at least 6 months) were examined. The control group included 16 normal-sighted subjects with a similar age and gender distribution.
For 17 out of the 27 patients with HVFDs performance (i.e. number of accidents) at the crossroads was comparable to that of the normal-sighted cohort. Patients with left-sided HVFDs due to right-sided brain lesions had a worse driving performance than patients with right-sided HVFDs.
Conclusions: The existence and extent of HVFDs per se seem to be inadequate to predict the successful navigation of an intersection under virtual reality conditions.

 
Previous page    
Top of page